Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa LecturesMouton de Gruyter, 1993 - 371 من الصفحات The architecture of the human language faculty has been one of the main foci of the linguistic research of the last half century. This branch of linguistics, broadly known as Generative Grammar, is concerned with the formulation of explanatory formal accounts of linguistic phenomena with the ulterior goal of gaining insight into the properties of the 'language organ'. The series comprises high quality monographs and collected volumes that address such issues. The topics in this series range from phonology to semantics, from syntax to information structure, from mathematical linguistics to studies of the lexicon. To discuss your book idea or submit a proposal, please contact Birgit Sievert |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-3 من 57
الصفحة 108
... seen . Nor can a variable appear in this position , since by 2.4.2 . ( 17 ) ( from left to right ) , variables must be Case - marked ; cf. § 3.2.2 . Therefore , the only possible conclusion is that the small clause construction ( 20 ) ...
... seen . Nor can a variable appear in this position , since by 2.4.2 . ( 17 ) ( from left to right ) , variables must be Case - marked ; cf. § 3.2.2 . Therefore , the only possible conclusion is that the small clause construction ( 20 ) ...
الصفحة 197
... seen HIM ( HIM with focal stress ) In ( i ) , he may be proximate to John , but not in ( ii ) or ( iii ) ; and in ( iv ) , HIM may be proximate to John . These are the predicted results if the binding theory applies at S - structure ...
... seen HIM ( HIM with focal stress ) In ( i ) , he may be proximate to John , but not in ( ii ) or ( iii ) ; and in ( iv ) , HIM may be proximate to John . These are the predicted results if the binding theory applies at S - structure ...
الصفحة 298
... seen ( ii ) who would you prefer for Bill to have seen ( iii ) who did you want Bill to have seen At S - structure , the analyses are , in each case , of the form ( 33 ) : ( 33 ) who did you V [ [ COMP t a ] [ s Bill to have seen t ] ...
... seen ( ii ) who would you prefer for Bill to have seen ( iii ) who did you want Bill to have seen At S - structure , the analyses are , in each case , of the form ( 33 ) : ( 33 ) who did you V [ [ COMP t a ] [ s Bill to have seen t ] ...
المحتوى
Subsystems of core grammar | 17 |
On government and binding | 153 |
Specification of empty categories | 231 |
حقوق النشر | |
1 من الأقسام الأخرى غير ظاهرة
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
0-criterion 0-position analysis anaphors antecedent Aoun appear applies argument assign a 0-role assume assumption base-generated Bill binding theory bound c-command CALIFORNIA/SANTA CRUZ Case-assignment Case-marked chapter Chomsky clitic co-superscripted coindexed COMP condition configurations consider constructions CRUZ The University deletion derive discussion e-marked e-role element embedded clause empty category English examples excluded fact Filter function chain governing category infinitival INFL interpretation Italian John Kayne Lasnik lexical lexical categories LF-component LF-representation matrix subject movement nominative non-argument non-configurational languages Note notion NP-trace OB-framework obligatory option passive morphology phrase possible post-verbal NP preposition preposition stranding pro-drop languages pro-drop parameter problem projection principle pronominal pronoun properties question R-expressions reference RES(NIC Rizzi rule Move-a S-deletion S-structure sentence small clause subcategorization subcategorization frames subjacency subject position Suppose syntactic Tense that-t tion trace ungoverned ungrammatical UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA/SANTA variable violated wh-movement wh-phrase X-bar theory