Urban Problems and Community DevelopmentIn recent years, concerned governments, businesses, and civic groups have launched ambitious programs of community development designed to halt, and even reverse, decades of urban decline. But while massive amounts of effort and money are being dedicated to improving the inner-cities, two important questions have gone unanswered: Can community development actually help solve long-standing urban problems? And, based on social science analyses, what kinds of initiatives can make a difference? This book surveys what we currently know and what we need to know about community development's past, current, and potential contributions. The authors--economists, sociologists, political scientists, and a historian--define community development broadly to include all capacity building (including social, intellectual, physical, financial, and political assets) aimed at improving the quality of life in low- to moderate-income neighborhoods. The book addresses the history of urban development strategies, the politics of resource allocation, business and workforce development, housing, community development corporations, informal social organizations, schooling, and public security. |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 94
This volume synthesizes and supplements social science research to inform activities in the public , private , and nonprofit sectors as well as future research to improve the quality of life in low- to moderate - income urban ...
It also subsumes the education , health care , and community - building aspects of local human service provision by nonprofit and for - profit organizations and government . Even more broadly , individuals and organizations in the ...
But should nonprofits that include physical development among their activities be how community development is defined ? Is this how CDCs 8. See the phase I evaluation report for NCDI by OMG ( 1995 ) . Also see chapter 5 by Stoutland in ...
31 This program funded the first generation of nonprofit organizations that formally called themselves community development corporations . The Bedford - Stuyvesant 28. For example , see Carmichael and Hamilton ( 1967 ) . 29.
However, at the same time that nonprofits have become increasingly important as suppliers of new and rehabilitated units, most of the poor still live in properties owned and controlled in the private market and most receive no housing ...