...Federal Consititutions, and that a license tax levied upon such a privilege is unconstitutional because "a State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution." The ordinance was invalid, the court pointed out, because the...

...Federal Consititutions, and that a license tax levied upon such a privilege is unconstitutional because "a State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution." The ordinance was invalid, the court pointed out, because the...

...that "Jehovah's Witnesses" were engaged in a commercial rather than in a religious venture. P. 111. 4. A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P. 113. 5. The flat license tax here involved restrains in advance...

...that "Jehovah's Witnesses" were engaged in a commercial rather than in a religious venture. P. 111. 4. A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P. 113. 5. The flat license tax here involved restrains in advance...

...that "Jehovah's Witnesses" were engaged in a commercial rather than in a religious venture. P. 111. 4. A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P. 113. 5. The flat license tax here involved restrains in advance...

...held that they may be compelled to do so. We said in Murdoch v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105, 113, that "A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. Thus, it may not exact a license tax for the privilege of carrying...

...-liberty' of the individual protected by the 5th Amendment." (Adkins v. Children's Hospital ofD.C., 361 US 525), and: "A State may not impose a charge...choose to deny a fundamental constitutional right as a means of collecting revenue." (United States v. State of Texas, 252 F. Supp. 234), and: "The Supreme...

...'liberty' of the individual protected by the 5th Amendment." (Adkins v. Children's Hospital ofD.C., 361 US 525), and: "A State may not impose a charge...of a right guaranteed by the Federal Constitution." (Murdoch v. Pennsylvania, and: "The legislature and the people may not choose to deny a fundamental...

...speech, press and religion guaranteed by the First Amendment are unconstitutional, the Court ruled that a "state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution." 319 DS at 113, 87 L.Ed, at 1298. The Court noted: It is one thing...

...is a license tax— a flat tax imposed on the exercise of a privilege granted by the Bill of Rights. A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution." Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 106, 113 (1943). See Thomas v....