Work ChoicesFederation Press, 2007 - 190 من الصفحات Andrew Stewart and George Williams, leading scholars and media commentators, explain what has been called the most important decision of the Australian High Court since the Tasmanian Dam Case in 1983. They show what was being argued and why it was being argued, as well as what was decided and the implications for Australia’s future. They include key passages of the majority judgment, and from the dissents of Justices Kirby and Callinan. Is this “a destabilising intrusion of direct federal lawmaking into areas of legislation which, since federation, have been the subjects of State laws†(Justice Kirby)? Might it reduce State Parliaments to “impotent debating societies†(Justice Callinan)? |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 22
الصفحة 1
... parties and the ALP . In a nutshell , the Work Choices reforms shifted the balance in favour of employers , giving them greater freedom in the terms on which they can hire and ( if necessary ) fire their staff . As a corol- lary , the ...
... parties and the ALP . In a nutshell , the Work Choices reforms shifted the balance in favour of employers , giving them greater freedom in the terms on which they can hire and ( if necessary ) fire their staff . As a corol- lary , the ...
الصفحة 16
... parties together to assist them in reaching a negotiated settlement ( conciliation ) , and then if necessary by hearing their claims and deciding between them ( arbitration ) . Kingston and other colonial leaders of the day , including ...
... parties together to assist them in reaching a negotiated settlement ( conciliation ) , and then if necessary by hearing their claims and deciding between them ( arbitration ) . Kingston and other colonial leaders of the day , including ...
الصفحة 21
... parties might be able to exercise some choice as to whether to pursue a grievance before a federal or State tribunal , regardless of the type of instru- ment that covered them . This was especially true of workers pursuing claims in ...
... parties might be able to exercise some choice as to whether to pursue a grievance before a federal or State tribunal , regardless of the type of instru- ment that covered them . This was especially true of workers pursuing claims in ...
الصفحة 28
... Parties were encouraged to formalise their agreements and register them with the Australian Industrial Relations Commission ( AIRC ) . Crucially , the AIRC's power to determine whether such agreements were in the public interest was ...
... Parties were encouraged to formalise their agreements and register them with the Australian Industrial Relations Commission ( AIRC ) . Crucially , the AIRC's power to determine whether such agreements were in the public interest was ...
الصفحة 29
... Parties could enter into these individual agreements with a minimum of fuss . They needed only to comply with certain basic statutory conditions . The take - up rate of these agreements was never substantial , covering perhaps no more ...
... Parties could enter into these individual agreements with a minimum of fuss . They needed only to comply with certain basic statutory conditions . The take - up rate of these agreements was never substantial , covering perhaps no more ...
المحتوى
6 | |
26 | |
5 | 40 |
6 | 59 |
7 | 69 |
9 | 129 |
Making Law Through Regulations | 135 |
Other Issues | 142 |
What It Means for Labour Relations | 152 |
13 | 166 |
Extracts from the Australian Constitution | 176 |
Index | 182 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accepted activities affairs agreements amendments applied approach arbitration areas argument Australian authority award balance bodies broad challenge changes Chapter character Choices Common Commonwealth concerned conferred connection constitutional corporations construction continue corporations power covered deal Debates decision doctrine effect employers employment enacted Engineers established exclude existence expressed extending fact Federal Parliament federal system field foreign functions further given grant head of power High Court important incorporated industrial disputes industrial relations intended interpretation interstate involved issue judges Justice Kirby labour law with respect least legislative power limits majority matters meaning operation Parliament particular parties persons plaintiffs possible present principle prohibited proposed provisions question reach reasons reference reforms regulation rejected Relations Act relationships relevant restriction result scope specific submissions suggested Territory trading unions validity workers Workplace Relations